Contributor Article: Dana Reijerkerk on Open Source within DAM
As part of our series on Open Source within DAM, data consultant and DAM Manager Dana Reijerkerk has contributed an article presenting a balanced analysis of open-source and proprietary DAM solutions, effectively highlighting their advantages and challenges. Dana successfully conveys the idea that choosing between the two is rarely a simple decision, but one that depends on an organisation’s technical capabilities, budget, and long-term goals.
The discussion on proprietary DAM systems is particularly well-articulated, outlining their high initial costs whilst emphasising their convenience, vendor support, and security benefits. The article makes a strong case for how these solutions can be more cost-effective in the long run, especially for organisations without in-house developer support.
“Proprietary solutions are beneficial because they include: dedicated developer and information technology support, softwares receive regular updates and new features, and the system usually includes guarantees for data protection, data management, and data security. In the long-term, vendor support can be very helpful when the DAM needs at an organisation evolve or when a data migration to a new system is needed.” [Read More]
The examination of open-source DAM solutions is similarly insightful, acknowledging their appeal in terms of flexibility, sustainability, and cost savings. However, it also rightly critiques the misconception that open-source tools are inherently more accessible, pointing out the substantial investment needed for maintenance, updates, and troubleshooting. The emphasis on the challenges of usability, documentation, and reliance on volunteer contributions adds a necessary dose of realism.
“In reality, open-source technologies and the so-called “Do-It-Yourself” approach they offer is unattainable for most. Open-source DAM technologies require in-house additional support and investment in the short and long-term to be usable.” [Read More]
Of notable relevance is the article’s practical approach to decision-making: instead of presenting a one-size-fits-all recommendation, it provides guiding questions that help organisations assess their needs realistically. The focus on automation, developer support, and total cost (beyond financial considerations) ensures that the discussion remains relevant to different sectors.
“Cost is not just dollar signs. Cost includes money, staff time, personnel, developer maintenance (system updates and configurations which can mean system down time), anticipated data migrations, and digital preservation challenges especially technological obsolescence.” [Read More]
Overall, the article provides a well-researched and pragmatic view of open-source DAM solutions. Dana effectively dismantles the notion that open-source is an easy alternative while also recognising the inherent limitations of proprietary systems. The conclusion is especially strong, urging organisations to view open-source DAM not as a “Do-It-Yourself” solution but as part of a broader strategic digital ecosystem.
You can read the full article at the link below.
https://digitalassetmanagementnews.org/features/considerations-for-open-source-dam-solutions/
Share this Article: